Revolting against the rulers :
Follows Islamic stand on this issue by every group :
|| Salafi-Madkhali
All revolt, procession, demonstration, opposition or protest against the ruler is strongly forbidden and a grave sin. We should support the ruler even if he is an oppressor, but dislike his works of oppression, not him. And continue to co-operate and obey him in all other ways that aren't forbidden in Islam.
|| Hanafi-Dewbondi
You can revolt against a ruler only when you have a chance of winning, and only if it benefits the community without any harm on themselves. And one should not engage in any anti government activity that puts him or his family in danger.
|| Ikhwani-Jamat
It's one's duty to protest the bad deeds of the rulers and anyone that declines to protest is in sin. And it's obligatory for the people to establish the religion of Islam in government and state because that's the gist of this religion. But this should be done in conventional way through election and procession, and not with arms.
|| Jihadi
Any ruler who breaks the order of Allah in judgment and justice has himself turned non-muslim, including everyone that support him. And they must be fought against with arms. Any muslim who refuses to consider these rulers as non-muslim are themselves "murjia", i.e another type of non-muslim themselves.