News of an BD actress in poverty. As I was skimming down the article, was looking for a reason, why? One very small line "she took treatment for drug addiction." No other explanation.
The whole article's tone is very empathetic towards her. As like she is in poverty and none is doing anything.
The back story I can assume, no matter how much you help her all that money will be wasted behind drugs. She will still be in similar poverty.
This isn't a single special case. Rather every victim that surprises you has a backstory. Reading which you might not get as much sympathetic towards him as before.
Lets cut short to the lesson : we still have to help the victim, regardless of his past. But not in the cases when we know that the help will go to waste.